Validity of a visual impairment questionnaire in measuring cataract surgery outcomes
PURPOSE: To test the validity of the Impact of Visual Impairment (IVI) questionnaire in a cataract population.
METHOD: Cataract patients recruited from a hospital waiting list completed the IVI questionnaire. The scale was assessed for fit to the Rasch model. Unidimensionality, item and person fit to the model, response category performance, differential item functioning (whether different subgroups responded differently), and targeting of item difficulty to patient ability were assessed.
RESULTS: Overall, the IVI questionnaire performed well; there were ordered thresholds, person separation reliability was 0.97, and it was free from differential item functioning. One item (worry about eyesight getting worse) misfit the model and was removed. There was evidence of multidimensionality, indicating that the overall IVI score should be discarded; however, the 3 subscales (reading and accessing information, mobility and independence, and emotional well-being) functioned well. Several items calibrated differently in cataract patients compared with low-vision patients, indicating different issues are important to each population and that there is a need for population-specific conversion algorithms. Targeting of the IVI items was biased toward more impaired patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3 subscales of the IVI questionnaire functioned well in a cataract population. However, additional items targeting the less impaired patients, especially second-eye cataract patients, would improve measurement.
J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:925–933 Q 2008 ASCRS and ESCRS.
Konrad Pesudovs, PhD, Lynda E. Caudle, GCertPH, Gwyneth Rees, PhD, Ecosse L. Lamoureux, PhD
Index of Papers